• The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 against EPA’s broad water permit powers.
• The decision removes “end-result” quality requirements for permits.
• San Francisco argued for clear permit rules, and the Court agreed.
• Environmental groups warn of increased pollution risks.

March 5, 2025 — The U.S. Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision on March 4, 2025, in City and County of San Francisco v. Environmental Protection Agency, limiting the EPA’s authority in issuing water pollution permits. The ruling determined that the Clean Water Act (CWA) does not allow the EPA to hold permittees responsible for the overall water quality of receiving water bodies, only for their direct discharges.

Background of the Case.

The dispute arose when San Francisco challenged provisions in its EPA-issued wastewater permits that held it accountable for the final water quality in the Pacific Ocean and San Francisco Bay, arguing that it could only control its own discharges—not pollution from other sources. The Supreme Court agreed, reversing a lower court decision and instructing the EPA to refine its permitting approach.

Justice Alito authored the majority opinion, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch. The dissent, written by Justice Barrett and supported by Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson, warned of potential environmental harm from the ruling.

Impact on Clean Water Regulations.

The ruling follows a trend of Supreme Court decisions narrowing the scope of the Clean Water Act. Environmental advocates, including the Southern Environmental Law Center, expressed concern that removing end-result permit conditions could lead to increased industrial and stormwater pollution, weakening protections for drinking water and aquatic ecosystems.

Conversely, San Francisco officials hailed the decision as a victory for predictable and enforceable water quality standards. The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission emphasized that the ruling clarifies the responsibility of permit holders while maintaining EPA’s role in setting pollution limits.

The decision marks a shift in how water pollution permits will be enforced nationwide. While cities and wastewater agencies see it as reducing regulatory uncertainty, environmental groups argue it could make it harder to prevent long-term pollution in rivers and lakes. Moving forward, the EPA may need to revisit its permit frameworks to align with the Court’s ruling while still ensuring clean water protections.

Related posts:

Reclamation invests $4.6 million in snow monitoring projects Agencies to secure Rio Grande water amid El Vado Dam repairs Judge blocks Denver Water’s Gross Reservoir expansion project Arizona seeks teams to bring new water supplies